Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impact of fragmented care on retroperitoneal sarcomas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fragmented care (FC) is associated with mixed outcomes. This analysis examines FC's impact on retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) treatment.

METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for adult patients with non-metastatic, surgically-resected RPS. FC was defined as diagnosis/treatment at >1 facility. Univariable and multivariable analyses examined factors associated with FC and its impact on overall survival.

RESULTS: 4976 patients were included; 45.6 ​% experienced FC. Non-FC and FC cohorts were similar. Dedifferentiated liposarcoma were more common in FC cohort, as were poorly differentiated and undifferentiated tumors (p ​< ​0.05). FC cohort had greater travel distance and time-to-treatment (both p ​< ​0.001). Variables independently associated with FC included urban and rural setting and histology (poorly differentiated and undifferentiated) (all p ​< ​0.05). After controlling for other variables, FC was not associated with survival.

CONCLUSION: FC patients experienced longer distance travelled and time-to-treatment without survival impact. National emphasis must be placed on broadening access to equitable, high-quality sarcoma care.

Original languageEnglish
Article number116319
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume247
Early online dateMar 26 2025
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Fragmented care
  • NCDB
  • Retroperitoneal sarcoma

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of fragmented care on retroperitoneal sarcomas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this