Impact of fragmented care on retroperitoneal sarcomas

Denise L. Wong, Jordan Fredette, Jill Hasler, Andrea S. Porpiglia, Stephanie H. Greco, Sanjay S. Reddy, Jeffrey M. Farma, Anthony M. Villano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fragmented care (FC) is associated with mixed outcomes. This analysis examines FC's impact on retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) treatment.

METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for adult patients with non-metastatic, surgically-resected RPS. FC was defined as diagnosis/treatment at >1 facility. Univariable and multivariable analyses examined factors associated with FC and its impact on overall survival.

RESULTS: 4976 patients were included; 45.6 ​% experienced FC. Non-FC and FC cohorts were similar. Dedifferentiated liposarcoma were more common in FC cohort, as were poorly differentiated and undifferentiated tumors (p ​< ​0.05). FC cohort had greater travel distance and time-to-treatment (both p ​< ​0.001). Variables independently associated with FC included urban and rural setting and histology (poorly differentiated and undifferentiated) (all p ​< ​0.05). After controlling for other variables, FC was not associated with survival.

CONCLUSION: FC patients experienced longer distance travelled and time-to-treatment without survival impact. National emphasis must be placed on broadening access to equitable, high-quality sarcoma care.

Original languageEnglish
Article number116319
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Early online dateMar 26 2025
DOIs
StateE-pub ahead of print - Mar 26 2025

Keywords

  • Fragmented care
  • NCDB
  • Retroperitoneal sarcoma

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of fragmented care on retroperitoneal sarcomas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this