TY - JOUR
T1 - Immune recognition of irradiated cancer cells
AU - Wennerberg, Erik
AU - Vanpouille-Box, Claire
AU - Bornstein, Sophia
AU - Yamazaki, Takahiro
AU - Demaria, Sandra
AU - Galluzzi, Lorenzo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2017/11
Y1 - 2017/11
N2 - Ionizing irradiation has been extensively employed for the clinical management of solid tumors, with therapeutic or palliative intents, for decades. Until recently, radiation therapy (RT) was believed to mediate antineoplastic activity mostly (if not only) as a consequence of cancer cell-intrinsic effects. Indeed, the macromolecular damage imposed to malignant cells by RT initiates one or multiple signal transduction cascades that drive a permanent proliferative arrest (cellular senescence) or regulated cell death. Both these phenomena show a rather linear dose-response correlation. However, RT also mediates consistent immunological activity, not only as an “on-target effect” originating within irradiated cancer cells, but also as an “off-target effect” depending on the interaction between RT and stromal, endothelial, and immune components of the tumor microenvironment. Interestingly, the immunological activity of RT does not exhibit linear dose-response correlation. Here, we discuss the mechanisms whereby RT alters the capacity of the immune system to recognize and eliminate irradiated cancer cells, either as an “on-target” or as on “off-target” effect. In particular, we discuss the antagonism between the immunostimulatory and immunosuppressive effects of RT as we delineate combinatorial strategies to boost the former at the expenses of the latter.
AB - Ionizing irradiation has been extensively employed for the clinical management of solid tumors, with therapeutic or palliative intents, for decades. Until recently, radiation therapy (RT) was believed to mediate antineoplastic activity mostly (if not only) as a consequence of cancer cell-intrinsic effects. Indeed, the macromolecular damage imposed to malignant cells by RT initiates one or multiple signal transduction cascades that drive a permanent proliferative arrest (cellular senescence) or regulated cell death. Both these phenomena show a rather linear dose-response correlation. However, RT also mediates consistent immunological activity, not only as an “on-target effect” originating within irradiated cancer cells, but also as an “off-target effect” depending on the interaction between RT and stromal, endothelial, and immune components of the tumor microenvironment. Interestingly, the immunological activity of RT does not exhibit linear dose-response correlation. Here, we discuss the mechanisms whereby RT alters the capacity of the immune system to recognize and eliminate irradiated cancer cells, either as an “on-target” or as on “off-target” effect. In particular, we discuss the antagonism between the immunostimulatory and immunosuppressive effects of RT as we delineate combinatorial strategies to boost the former at the expenses of the latter.
KW - autophagy
KW - danger signaling
KW - immunogenic cell death
KW - mutational load
KW - NKG2D
KW - tumor neoantigens
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031127840&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/imr.12568
DO - 10.1111/imr.12568
M3 - Review article
C2 - 29027232
AN - SCOPUS:85031127840
SN - 0105-2896
VL - 280
SP - 220
EP - 230
JO - Immunological Reviews
JF - Immunological Reviews
IS - 1
ER -