Health insurance and cardiac transplantation: A call for reform

Louise P. King, Laura A. Siminoff, Dan M. Meyer, Clyde W. Yancy, W. Steves Ring, Thomas W. Mayo, Mark H. Drazner

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

Cardiac transplantation is an accepted therapy for patients with end-stage heart failure (ESHF). Presently in the U.S., patients with ESHF need to have health insurance or another funding source to be considered eligible for cardiac transplantation. Whether it is appropriate to exclude potential recipients solely due to lack of finances has received considerable interest including being the subject of a recent major motion picture (John Q, New Line Cinema, 2002). However, one important aspect of this debate has been underappreciated and insufficiently addressed. Specifically, organ donation does not require the donor to have health insurance. Thus, individuals donate their hearts although they themselves would not have been eligible to receive a transplant had they needed one. By querying Siminoff's National Study of Family Consent to Organ Donation database, we find that this situation is not uncommon as ∼23% of organ donors are uninsured. Herein we also discuss how the funding requirement for cardiac transplantation has been addressed by the federal government in the past, its implications on the organ donor consent process, and its potential impact on organ donation rates. We call for a government-sponsored, multidisciplinary task force to address this situation in hopes of remedying the inequities in the present system of organ allocation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1388-1391
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume45
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - May 3 2005

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Health insurance and cardiac transplantation: A call for reform'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this