Grant-writing pearls and pitfalls

Jeffrey C. Liu, Melissa A. Pynnonen, Maie St John, Eben L. Rosenthal, Marion E. Couch, Cecelia E. Schmalbach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

This invited article reviews the grant process to include the following objectives: (1) to provide an understanding of otolaryngology funding mechanisms in the context of career progression; (2) to outline key components of a well-written grant; (3) to highlight vital members of a successful research team, with emphasis on the mentor-mentee relationship; and (4) to clarify grant scoring with emphasis on common pitfalls to avoid. Current otolaryngology funding mechanisms and up-to-date resources are provided. The review is aimed to assist otolaryngology residents, faculty new to the grant process, as well as experienced researchers striving to improve their grant review scores.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)226-232
Number of pages7
JournalOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume154
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • CORE
  • NIH
  • grant funding
  • research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Grant-writing pearls and pitfalls'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this