Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Genitourinary functioning and depressive symptoms over time in younger versus older men treated for prostate cancer

  • Columbia University
  • Temple University
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Carnegie Mellon University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background/Purpose: This study examined the relation of age to genitourinary functioning and depressive symptoms over time and examined how age influences the relation between genitourinary functioning and depressive symptoms over time in men treated for localized prostate cancer. Methods: Participants were 234 men who completed interviews that assessed genitourinary functioning and depressive symptoms at 2, 4, 10 and 16 months after treatment. Analyses were statistically controlled for potential confounds. Results: Compared with younger men (≤65.5), older men had significantly poorer sexual function and slower improvement. Level of urinary functioning was inversely associated with level of depressive symptoms regardless of age. Level of sexual functioning was inversely associated with level of depressive symptoms but only in younger men. Conclusion: Interventions may be particularly helpful for all men with urinary dysfunction and for younger men with sexual dysfunction in order to improve symptoms of depression.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)275-283
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Behavioral Medicine
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2010

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Age
  • Depression
  • Prostate cancer
  • Quality of life
  • Sexual functioning
  • Urinary functioning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Genitourinary functioning and depressive symptoms over time in younger versus older men treated for prostate cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this