TY - JOUR
T1 - Four-year survival with nivolumab in patients with previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
T2 - a pooled analysis
AU - Antonia, Scott J.
AU - Borghaei, Hossein
AU - Ramalingam, Suresh S.
AU - Horn, Leora
AU - De Castro Carpeño, Javier
AU - Pluzanski, Adam
AU - Burgio, Marco A.
AU - Garassino, Marina
AU - Chow, Laura Q.M.
AU - Gettinger, Scott
AU - Crinò, Lucio
AU - Planchard, David
AU - Butts, Charles
AU - Drilon, Alexander
AU - Wojcik-Tomaszewska, Joanna
AU - Otterson, Gregory A.
AU - Agrawal, Shruti
AU - Li, Ang
AU - Penrod, John R.
AU - Brahmer, Julie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2019/10
Y1 - 2019/10
N2 - Background: Phase 3 clinical data has shown higher proportions of patients with objective response, longer response duration, and longer overall survival with nivolumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to evaluate the long-term benefit of nivolumab and the effect of response and disease control on subsequent survival. Methods: We pooled data from four clinical studies of nivolumab in patients with previously treated NSCLC (CheckMate 017, 057, 063, and 003) to evaluate survival outcomes. Trials of nivolumab in the second-line or later setting with at least 4 years follow-up were included. Comparisons of nivolumab versus docetaxel included all randomised patients from the phase 3 CheckMate 017 and 057 studies. We did landmark analyses by response status at 6 months to determine post-landmark survival outcomes. We excluded patients who did not have a radiographic tumour assessment at 6 months. Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of nivolumab. Findings: Across all four studies, 4-year overall survival with nivolumab was 14% (95% CI 11–17) for all patients (n=664), 19% (15–24) for those with at least 1% PD-L1 expression, and 11% (7–16) for those with less than 1% PD-L1 expression. In CheckMate 017 and 057, 4-year overall survival was 14% (95% CI 11–18) in patients treated with nivolumab, compared with 5% (3–7) in patients treated with docetaxel. Survival subsequent to response at 6 months on nivolumab or docetaxel was longer than after progressive disease at 6 months, with hazard ratios for overall survival of 0·18 (95% 0·12–0·27) for nivolumab and 0·43 (0·29–0·65) for docetaxel; for stable disease versus progressive disease, hazard ratios were 0·52 (0·37–0·71) for nivolumab and 0·80 (0·61–1·04) for docetaxel. Long-term data did not show any new safety signals. Interpretation: Patients with advanced NSCLC treated with nivolumab achieved a greater duration of response compared with patients treated with docetaxel, which was associated with a long-term survival advantage. Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb.
AB - Background: Phase 3 clinical data has shown higher proportions of patients with objective response, longer response duration, and longer overall survival with nivolumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to evaluate the long-term benefit of nivolumab and the effect of response and disease control on subsequent survival. Methods: We pooled data from four clinical studies of nivolumab in patients with previously treated NSCLC (CheckMate 017, 057, 063, and 003) to evaluate survival outcomes. Trials of nivolumab in the second-line or later setting with at least 4 years follow-up were included. Comparisons of nivolumab versus docetaxel included all randomised patients from the phase 3 CheckMate 017 and 057 studies. We did landmark analyses by response status at 6 months to determine post-landmark survival outcomes. We excluded patients who did not have a radiographic tumour assessment at 6 months. Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of nivolumab. Findings: Across all four studies, 4-year overall survival with nivolumab was 14% (95% CI 11–17) for all patients (n=664), 19% (15–24) for those with at least 1% PD-L1 expression, and 11% (7–16) for those with less than 1% PD-L1 expression. In CheckMate 017 and 057, 4-year overall survival was 14% (95% CI 11–18) in patients treated with nivolumab, compared with 5% (3–7) in patients treated with docetaxel. Survival subsequent to response at 6 months on nivolumab or docetaxel was longer than after progressive disease at 6 months, with hazard ratios for overall survival of 0·18 (95% 0·12–0·27) for nivolumab and 0·43 (0·29–0·65) for docetaxel; for stable disease versus progressive disease, hazard ratios were 0·52 (0·37–0·71) for nivolumab and 0·80 (0·61–1·04) for docetaxel. Long-term data did not show any new safety signals. Interpretation: Patients with advanced NSCLC treated with nivolumab achieved a greater duration of response compared with patients treated with docetaxel, which was associated with a long-term survival advantage. Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb.
KW - Aged
KW - Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects
KW - B7-H1 Antigen/metabolism
KW - Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy
KW - Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
KW - Disease Progression
KW - Docetaxel/adverse effects
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Nivolumab/adverse effects
KW - Progression-Free Survival
KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
KW - Retreatment
KW - Survival Rate
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072654087&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=purepublist2023&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000488267700041&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS
U2 - 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30407-3
DO - 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30407-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 31422028
SN - 1470-2045
VL - 20
SP - 1395
EP - 1408
JO - The Lancet Oncology
JF - The Lancet Oncology
IS - 10
ER -