Flow cytometric analysis of nuclear DNA content in ovarian tumors association of ploidy with tumor type, histologic grade, and clinical stage

Janice M. Lage, David S. Weinberg, Phyllis C. Huettner, Steven D. Mark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

43 Scopus citations

Abstract

The authors undertook a prospective, flow cytometric study of nuclear DNA ploidy in 140 fresh ovarian tumors. There were 43 benign tumors, 27 borderline tumors, and 70 malignant tumors. Results of DNA ploidy analysis were compared to age at diagnosis, menopausal status, tumor size, histologic type, grade, and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage. Although the majority of benign tumors were diploid, 19% were aneuploid. Among the benign tumors, DNA ploidy was significantly associated with tumor type and tumor size. All borderline tumors were diploid. Of the 70 malignant tumors, 64% were aneuploid. In the malignant tumors, DNA aneuploidy had significant univariate associations with histologic type, grade, and FIGO stage. By multivariate analysis, DNA aneuploidy remained significantly associated with stage and grade, both known predictors of survival in ovarian cancer. These results indicate that DNA ploidy varies with the aggressive potential of an ovarian cancer and may, at the time of initial diagnosis, provide additional information about tumor prognosis. Cancer 1992; 69:2668‐2675.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2668-2675
Number of pages8
JournalCancer
Volume69
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 1992

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Aneuploidy
  • Cell Nucleus/chemistry
  • DNA, Neoplasm/analysis
  • Female
  • Flow Cytometry
  • Humans
  • Menopause
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics
  • Ploidies
  • Prognosis
  • Prospective Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Flow cytometric analysis of nuclear DNA content in ovarian tumors association of ploidy with tumor type, histologic grade, and clinical stage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this