Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Factors Affecting Implant Length in Primary Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement

  • Jake A. Miller
  • , Muhammed Hammad
  • , Eliad Amini
  • , Robert Andrianne
  • , Arthur L. Burnett
  • , Kelli Gross
  • , Martin S. Gross
  • , Georgios Hatzichristodoulou
  • , James Hotaling
  • , Tung Chin Hsieh
  • , Lawrence C. Jenkins
  • , James M. Jones
  • , Aaron Lentz
  • , Jason Levy
  • , Vaibhav Modgil
  • , Daniar Osmonov
  • , Sung Hun Park
  • , Ian Pearce
  • , Paul Perito
  • , Hossein Sadeghi-Nejad
  • Maxime Sempels, Jay Simhan, Alfredo Suarez-Sarmiento, Koenraad van Renterghem, J. Nicholas Warner, Faysal A. Yafi, Matthew Ziegelmann, David W. Barham
  • University of California at Irvine
  • University of Liege
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • University of Utah
  • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
  • Martha-Maria Hospital Nuremberg
  • University of California at San Diego
  • Tulane University
  • Duke University
  • Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
  • Kiel University
  • Sewum Prosthetic Urology Center of Excellence
  • Perito Urology
  • New York University
  • Jessa Hospital
  • Mayo Clinic
  • Brooke Army Medical Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate predictors of implant length for men undergoing primary IPP placement.

METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was performed for men undergoing primary IPP placement at 16 high-volume surgical centers. Patient demographics, comorbidities, operative approach, and implanted cylinder and rear-tip extender length were recorded. Associations between potential preoperative and intraoperative predictors of total device length were tested using non-parametric correlation and Kruskal-Wallis tests, followed by multiple regression.

RESULTS: Of 3951 men undergoing primary IPP placement from July 2016 to July 2021, the median implant length was 20 cm (IQR: 19-22). Shorter implant length was associated with increasing age in years (β = -0.01, P = .009), Asian ethnicity (β = -2.34, P = .008), history of radical prostatectomy (β = -0.35, P = .001), and use of an infrapubic surgical approach (β = -1.02, P <.001). Black or African American ethnicity was associated with the implantation of longer devices (β = 0.35, P <.001). No significant associations were recorded with BMI, history of intracavernosal injections, diabetes mellitus, tobacco use, radiation therapy, Peyronie's disease, priapism, or cavernosal dilation technique.

CONCLUSION: The length of an implanted penile prosthesis was found to be associated with preoperative and intraoperative factors including history of radical prostatectomy and operative approach. The knowledge of these associations may assist in the preoperative counseling of patients receiving IPP and help create accurate postoperative expectations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)240-244
Number of pages5
JournalUrology
Volume193
Early online dateJun 5 2024
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Aged
  • Erectile Dysfunction/surgery
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Penile Implantation/methods
  • Penile Prosthesis
  • Prostatectomy/methods
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Retrospective Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Factors Affecting Implant Length in Primary Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this