Erratum: "AAPM protocol for 40-300 kV x-ray beam dosimetry in radiotherapy and radiobiology": AAPM protocol for 40-300 kV x-ray beam dosimetry in radiotherapy and radiobiology (Medical Physics, (2001), 28, 6, (868-893), 10.1118/1.1374247)

C. M. Ma, C. W. Coffey, L. A. DeWerd, C. Liu, R. Nath, S. M. Seltzer, J. P. Seuntjens

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

In Ma et al.,1 two typographic errors were found in the printed version of the report. A division symbol was missing in Eq. (2), which shows the relation between the air-kerma calibration factor, NK, and the frequently used exposure calibration factor, NX. The correct equation should be 2 (Figure presented.) where (W/e)air is the average energy expended per unit charge of ionization produced in dry air, having the value 33.97 J/C, and (1 − g) corrects for the effect of radiative losses (mainly due to bremsstrahlung emission) by the secondary charged particles, and g is less than 0.1% for photons below 300 keV in air. Eq. (7) was recommended for deriving the end effect, δt, as described by Attix.2 The correct equation for calculating δt should be 7 (Figure presented.) where M1 and M2 are the chamber readings for exposure time Δt1 and Δt2, respectively. Note that δt can either be positive or negative. To ensure the accuracy of the measured end effect, the graphical method shall be used during the machine commissioning and annual QA. The mathematical method may be used for the monthly QA measurement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3886
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume50
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: "AAPM protocol for 40-300 kV x-ray beam dosimetry in radiotherapy and radiobiology": AAPM protocol for 40-300 kV x-ray beam dosimetry in radiotherapy and radiobiology (Medical Physics, (2001), 28, 6, (868-893), 10.1118/1.1374247)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this