TY - JOUR
T1 - Endoscopic Management of Ureteral Strictures
T2 - an Update
AU - Lucas, Jacob W.
AU - Ghiraldi, Eric
AU - Ellis, Jeffrey
AU - Friedlander, Justin I.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2018/4/1
Y1 - 2018/4/1
N2 - Purpose of Review: This review focuses on the role of endoscopic treatment of ureteral stricture disease (USD) in the era of minimally invasive surgery. Recent Findings: There is a relative paucity of recent literature regarding the endoscopic treatment of USD. Laser endopyelotomy and balloon dilation are associated with good outcomes in treatment-naïve patients with short (OpenSPiltSPi 2 cm), non-ischemic, benign ureteral strictures with a functional renal unit. If stricture recurs, repetitive dilation and laser endopyleotomy is not recommended, as success rates are low in this scenario. Patients with low-complexity ureteroenteric strictures and transplant strictures may benefit from endoscopic treatment options, although formal reconstruction offers higher rates of success. Summary: Formal ureteral reconstruction remains the gold-standard treatment for ureteral stricture disease as it is associated with higher rates of complete resolution. However, in carefully selected patients, endoscopic treatment modalities provide a low-cost, low-morbidity alternative.
AB - Purpose of Review: This review focuses on the role of endoscopic treatment of ureteral stricture disease (USD) in the era of minimally invasive surgery. Recent Findings: There is a relative paucity of recent literature regarding the endoscopic treatment of USD. Laser endopyelotomy and balloon dilation are associated with good outcomes in treatment-naïve patients with short (OpenSPiltSPi 2 cm), non-ischemic, benign ureteral strictures with a functional renal unit. If stricture recurs, repetitive dilation and laser endopyleotomy is not recommended, as success rates are low in this scenario. Patients with low-complexity ureteroenteric strictures and transplant strictures may benefit from endoscopic treatment options, although formal reconstruction offers higher rates of success. Summary: Formal ureteral reconstruction remains the gold-standard treatment for ureteral stricture disease as it is associated with higher rates of complete resolution. However, in carefully selected patients, endoscopic treatment modalities provide a low-cost, low-morbidity alternative.
KW - Constriction, Pathologic/etiology
KW - Dilatation
KW - Humans
KW - Kidney Pelvis/surgery
KW - Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects
KW - Recurrence
KW - Ureteral Obstruction/etiology
KW - Ureteroscopy/methods
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042858004&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11934-018-0773-4
DO - 10.1007/s11934-018-0773-4
M3 - Review article
C2 - 29500521
AN - SCOPUS:85042858004
SN - 1527-2737
VL - 19
SP - 24
JO - Current Urology Reports
JF - Current Urology Reports
IS - 4
M1 - 24
ER -