Endometrial curettage at the time of cervical conization

Stephen C. Rubin, Michelle Battistini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Endometrial curettage often is done as a routine procedure at the time of cervical conization, although the indications for this are unclear. Of 207 consecutive cone biopsies done recently at the Medical College of Pennsylvania, 199 (96%) included endometrial curettage. Two patients exhibited mild endometrial hyperplasia; the rest had no significant abnormality. Three uterine perforations (1.5%) occurred. Routine endometrial curettage is not necessary at the time of conization, and should be limited to patients with specific indications for sampling the endometrium, based on history, physical examination, and the finding of abnormal glandular cells on cytology. It is estimated that the elimination of routine curettage would result in a savings of over $100 per patient.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)663-664
Number of pages2
JournalObstetrics and Gynecology
Volume67
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1986

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Biopsy/methods
  • Cervix Uteri/surgery
  • Dilatation and Curettage/adverse effects
  • Endometrium/pathology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hyperplasia/pathology
  • Middle Aged

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Endometrial curettage at the time of cervical conization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this