Effects of outcome framing on treatment decisions in the real world: Impact of framing on adjuvant breast cancer decisions

L. A. Siminoff, J. H. Fetting

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

97 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study was an in-depth examination of how 100 patients and physicians made treatment decisions about adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Specifically, the authors examined how outcome framing was associated with these decisions. Based on other studies, it was hypothesized that patients would choose more aggressive, nonstandard treatment regimens when outcomes were framed negatively, rather than positively. Contrary to these expectations, no significant associations were found between the framing of treatment outcomes and type of treatment chosen, or the acceptance or rejection of the physicians' treatment recommendations. Physicians practiced routinized communication patterns. Physicians tended to frame treatment outcomes similarly for all patients, regardless of severity of disease. It is concluded that the impact of outcome framing in real clinical situations is attenuated by verbal presentation of information and other factors more important to the decision process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)262-271
Number of pages10
JournalMedical Decision Making
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1989

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Breast Neoplasms/therapy
  • Decision Making
  • Decision Theory
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of outcome framing on treatment decisions in the real world: Impact of framing on adjuvant breast cancer decisions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this