Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Desirable performance characteristics for BCR-ABL measurement on an international reporting scale to allow consistent interpretation of individual patient response and comparison of response rates between clinical trials

  • Susan Branford
  • , Linda Fletcher
  • , Nicholas C.P. Cross
  • , Martin C. Müller
  • , Andreas Hochhaus
  • , Dong Wook Kim
  • , Jerald P. Radich
  • , Giuseppe Saglio
  • , Fabrizio Pane
  • , Suzanne Kamel-Reid
  • , Y. Lynn Wang
  • , Richard D. Press
  • , Kevin Lynch
  • , Zbigniew Rudzki
  • , John M. Goldman
  • , Timothy Hughes
  • Institute of Medical and Veterinary Science Australia
  • University of Southampton
  • Heidelberg University 
  • The Catholic University of Korea
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  • University of Turin
  • University of Naples Federico II
  • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
  • Cornell University
  • Oregon Health and Science University
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Australia
  • Hammersmith Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

351 Scopus citations

Abstract

An international basis for comparison of BCR-ABL mRNA levels is required for the common interpretation of data derived from individual laboratories. This will aid clinical decisions for individual patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and assist interpretation of results from clinical studies. We aligned BCR-ABL values generated by 38 laboratories to an international scale (IS) where a major molecular response (MMR) is 0.1% or less. Alignment was achieved by application of laboratory-specific conversion factors calculated by comparisons performed with patient samples against a reference method. A validation procedure was completed for 19 methods. We determined performance characteristics (bias and precision) for consistent interpretation of MMR after IS conversion. When methods achieved an average BCR-ABL difference of plus or minus 1.2-fold from the reference method and 95% limits of agreement within plus or minus 5-fold, the MMR concordance was 91 %. These criteria were met by 58% of methods. When not met, the MMR concordance was 74% or less. However, irrespective of precision, when the bias was plus or minus 1.2-fold as achieved by 89% of methods, there was good agreement between the overall MMR rates. This indicates that the IS can deliver accurate comparison of molecular response rates between clinical trials when measured by different laboratories.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3330-3338
Number of pages9
JournalBlood
Volume112
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 15 2008

Keywords

  • Chemistry, Clinical/methods
  • Clinical Trials as Topic/standards
  • Cytogenetics
  • Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl/chemistry
  • Genetic Techniques
  • Humans
  • Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy
  • Medical Oncology/methods
  • Reference Values
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Treatment Outcome

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Desirable performance characteristics for BCR-ABL measurement on an international reporting scale to allow consistent interpretation of individual patient response and comparison of response rates between clinical trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this