TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of Management and Outcomes of Symptomatic Urolithiasis During the COVID-19 Pandemic to a Comparative Cohort
AU - Nourian, Alex
AU - Uppaluri, Curran
AU - Chen, Michelle
AU - Ghiraldi, Eric M.
AU - Friedlander, Justin I.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - Objective: To analyze the clinical presentation and outcomes for patients who presented with symptomatic urolithiasis during the initial months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed Emergency Department (ED) presentations from a Philadelphia healthcare system for symptomatic urolithiasis between March and June 2020 and compared these with presentations for the same time period from the year prior. Patient demographics, stone characteristics, management, and clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 years. Results: One hundred and thirty-nine patients presented during 2020 compared to 269 in 2019. There were fewer patients who presented during the initial COVID-19 pandemic surge who had obesity (37.41% vs 49.44%, P = .024), hyperlipidemia (18.71% vs 31.60, P = .006), and asthma (5.76% vs 16.73%, P = .002). Although overall stone characteristics did not differ between the 2 groups, a larger proportion of patients in 2020 presented with an obstructing stone (81.16% vs 64.1%, P = .001). Patients who presented during the COVID-19 pandemic did not have higher rates of infection, acute kidney injury, or complications. Rates of surgical modalities, emergent procedures, and discharges from the ED were similar between the 2 years. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic initial surge resulted in fewer ED presentations for symptomatic urolithiasis; however, patients who did present were more likely to have obstructing stones, perhaps due to delaying presentation to avoid COVID-19 exposure in the ED. Despite higher rates of obstruction, clinical outcomes and morbidity were similar.
AB - Objective: To analyze the clinical presentation and outcomes for patients who presented with symptomatic urolithiasis during the initial months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed Emergency Department (ED) presentations from a Philadelphia healthcare system for symptomatic urolithiasis between March and June 2020 and compared these with presentations for the same time period from the year prior. Patient demographics, stone characteristics, management, and clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 years. Results: One hundred and thirty-nine patients presented during 2020 compared to 269 in 2019. There were fewer patients who presented during the initial COVID-19 pandemic surge who had obesity (37.41% vs 49.44%, P = .024), hyperlipidemia (18.71% vs 31.60, P = .006), and asthma (5.76% vs 16.73%, P = .002). Although overall stone characteristics did not differ between the 2 groups, a larger proportion of patients in 2020 presented with an obstructing stone (81.16% vs 64.1%, P = .001). Patients who presented during the COVID-19 pandemic did not have higher rates of infection, acute kidney injury, or complications. Rates of surgical modalities, emergent procedures, and discharges from the ED were similar between the 2 years. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic initial surge resulted in fewer ED presentations for symptomatic urolithiasis; however, patients who did present were more likely to have obstructing stones, perhaps due to delaying presentation to avoid COVID-19 exposure in the ED. Despite higher rates of obstruction, clinical outcomes and morbidity were similar.
KW - COVID-19/epidemiology
KW - Emergency Service, Hospital
KW - Humans
KW - Pandemics
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Urolithiasis/epidemiology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124908390&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2022.01.019
DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2022.01.019
M3 - Article
C2 - 35090864
AN - SCOPUS:85124908390
SN - 0090-4295
VL - 165
SP - 178
EP - 183
JO - Urology
JF - Urology
ER -