Comparing intervention strategies among rural, low SES, young adult tobacco users

David A. Zanis; Ronald E. Hollm; Daniel Derr; Jennifer K. Ibrahim; Bradley N. Collins; Donna Coviello; Jennifer Ryan Melochick

doi:10.5993/AJHB.35.2.11

Comparing intervention strategies among rural, low SES, young adult tobacco users

David A. Zanis, Ronald E. Hollm, Daniel Derr, Jennifer K. Ibrahim, Bradley N. Collins, Donna Coviello, Jennifer Ryan Melochick

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate 3-month tobacco quit rates of young adult tobacco users randomized to 2 intervention conditions. Methods: Overall 192 non-treatment-seeking 18-to-24-year-old tobacco users received educational information and advice to quit smoking. Participants were then block randomized to 2 brief intervention conditions: (1) a telephone quitline (TQ) N=90; or (2) a brief direct treatment intervention (BDTI) N=102. Results: A 90-day followup evaluation found that 19.6% of BDTI and 10.2% of TQ participants reported 30-day point prevalence tobacco quit rates (chisquare = 2.37, P=.09). Conclusions: BDTI can help non-treatmentseeking, low SES, young adult tobacco users quit smoking.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	240-247
Number of pages	8
Journal	American Journal of Health Behavior
Volume	35
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.35.2.11
State	Published - 2011
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Brief intervention
Cessation
Randomization
Recruitment
Tobacco

Access to Document

10.5993/AJHB.35.2.11

Cite this

@article{22f4bc4d07f747c7a8385ef5510c5039,

title = "Comparing intervention strategies among rural, low SES, young adult tobacco users",

abstract = "Objective: To evaluate 3-month tobacco quit rates of young adult tobacco users randomized to 2 intervention conditions. Methods: Overall 192 non-treatment-seeking 18-to-24-year-old tobacco users received educational information and advice to quit smoking. Participants were then block randomized to 2 brief intervention conditions: (1) a telephone quitline (TQ) N=90; or (2) a brief direct treatment intervention (BDTI) N=102. Results: A 90-day followup evaluation found that 19.6% of BDTI and 10.2% of TQ participants reported 30-day point prevalence tobacco quit rates (chisquare = 2.37, P=.09). Conclusions: BDTI can help non-treatmentseeking, low SES, young adult tobacco users quit smoking.",

keywords = "Brief intervention, Cessation, Randomization, Recruitment, Tobacco",

author = "Zanis, {David A.} and Hollm, {Ronald E.} and Daniel Derr and Ibrahim, {Jennifer K.} and Collins, {Bradley N.} and Donna Coviello and Melochick, {Jennifer Ryan}",

year = "2011",

doi = "10.5993/AJHB.35.2.11",

language = "English",

volume = "35",

pages = "240--247",

journal = "American Journal of Health Behavior",

issn = "1087-3244",

publisher = "PNG Publications",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing intervention strategies among rural, low SES, young adult tobacco users

AU - Zanis, David A.

AU - Hollm, Ronald E.

AU - Derr, Daniel

AU - Ibrahim, Jennifer K.

AU - Collins, Bradley N.

AU - Coviello, Donna

AU - Melochick, Jennifer Ryan

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Objective: To evaluate 3-month tobacco quit rates of young adult tobacco users randomized to 2 intervention conditions. Methods: Overall 192 non-treatment-seeking 18-to-24-year-old tobacco users received educational information and advice to quit smoking. Participants were then block randomized to 2 brief intervention conditions: (1) a telephone quitline (TQ) N=90; or (2) a brief direct treatment intervention (BDTI) N=102. Results: A 90-day followup evaluation found that 19.6% of BDTI and 10.2% of TQ participants reported 30-day point prevalence tobacco quit rates (chisquare = 2.37, P=.09). Conclusions: BDTI can help non-treatmentseeking, low SES, young adult tobacco users quit smoking.

AB - Objective: To evaluate 3-month tobacco quit rates of young adult tobacco users randomized to 2 intervention conditions. Methods: Overall 192 non-treatment-seeking 18-to-24-year-old tobacco users received educational information and advice to quit smoking. Participants were then block randomized to 2 brief intervention conditions: (1) a telephone quitline (TQ) N=90; or (2) a brief direct treatment intervention (BDTI) N=102. Results: A 90-day followup evaluation found that 19.6% of BDTI and 10.2% of TQ participants reported 30-day point prevalence tobacco quit rates (chisquare = 2.37, P=.09). Conclusions: BDTI can help non-treatmentseeking, low SES, young adult tobacco users quit smoking.

KW - Brief intervention

KW - Cessation

KW - Randomization

KW - Recruitment

KW - Tobacco

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952119246&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=purepublist2023&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000291937800011&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS

U2 - 10.5993/AJHB.35.2.11

DO - 10.5993/AJHB.35.2.11

M3 - Article

C2 - 21204686

SN - 1087-3244

VL - 35

SP - 240

EP - 247

JO - American Journal of Health Behavior

JF - American Journal of Health Behavior

IS - 2

ER -

Comparing intervention strategies among rural, low SES, young adult tobacco users

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this