Cervical conization findings in women with dysplastic cervical cytology and normal colposcopy

E. J. Ramirez, E. Hernandez, K. Miyazawa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

A review of 134 cervical conizations performed in a 36-month period showed that 18 were performed on patients with two or more cervical smears showing dysplasia but with essentially negative, satisfactory colposcopic evaluations, including normal colposcopically directed biopsies and endocervical curettings. A histologic diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) of various grades was established in 15 (83%) of the 18 conization specimens. Six (33%) of the 18 specimens harbored CIN 3. The histologic diagnosis of a more severe lesion than that indicated on cytology was rendered in five of the cases. Cervical conization should be performed when colposcopic evaluation of the cervix, vagina and vulva fails to identify the source of persistent CIN on Papanicolaou smears.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)359-361
Number of pages3
JournalThe Journal of reproductive medicine
Volume35
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1990

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Biopsy/methods
  • Cervix Uteri/pathology
  • Colposcopy
  • False Negative Reactions
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Papanicolaou Test
  • Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology
  • Vaginal Smears

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cervical conization findings in women with dysplastic cervical cytology and normal colposcopy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this