TY - JOUR
T1 - Cardiovascular Substructure Dose and Cardiac Events following Proton- and Photon-Based Chemoradiotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
AU - Natarajan, Jyotsna
AU - Yegya-Raman, Nikhil
AU - Kegelman, Timothy P.
AU - Kallan, Michael J.
AU - Roshkovan, Leonid
AU - Katz, Sharyn
AU - Ky, Bonnie
AU - Fradley, Michael
AU - Xiao, Ying
AU - Lee, Sang Ho
AU - Zhang, Zheng
AU - Langer, Corey
AU - Aggarwal, Charu
AU - Cohen, Roger
AU - Cengel, Keith
AU - Levin, William
AU - Berman, Abigail T.
AU - Feigenberg, Steven J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023
PY - 2023/9/1
Y1 - 2023/9/1
N2 - Purpose: Radiation therapy (RT) plays a critical role in treating locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer but has been associated with deleterious cardiac effects. We hypothesized that RT dose to certain cardiovascular substructures may be higher among those who experience post-chemoradiation (CRT) cardiac events, and that dose to specific substructures—the great vessels, atria, ventricles, and left anterior descending coronary artery—may be lower with proton- versus photon-based RT. Methods and Materials: In this retrospective review, we selected 26 patients who experienced cardiac events after CRT for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer and matched them to 26 patients who did not experience cardiac events after CRT. Matching was done based on RT technique (protons vs photons), age, sex, and cardiovascular comorbidity. For each patient, the whole heart and 10 cardiovascular substructures on the RT planning computerized tomography scan were manually contoured. Dosimetric comparisons were made between those who did and did not experience cardiac events and between the proton and photon groups. Results: There was no significant difference in heart or any cardiovascular substructure dose between those patients who experienced post-treatment cardiac events and those who did not (P > .05 for all). The mean heart dose in the patients receiving proton therapy was significantly lower than the mean heart dose in the patients receiving photon therapy (P = .032). The left ventricle, right ventricle, and the left anterior descending artery also had significantly lower doses (by multiple measures) when treated with protons (P = .0004, P < .0001, and P = .0002, respectively). Conclusions: Proton therapy may have a significant effect on decreasing dose to individual cardiovascular substructures compared with photon therapy. There was no significant difference in heart dose or dose to any cardiovascular substructure between patients who did and did not experience post-treatment cardiac events. Further research should be done to assess the association between cardiovascular substructure dose and post-treatment cardiac events.
AB - Purpose: Radiation therapy (RT) plays a critical role in treating locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer but has been associated with deleterious cardiac effects. We hypothesized that RT dose to certain cardiovascular substructures may be higher among those who experience post-chemoradiation (CRT) cardiac events, and that dose to specific substructures—the great vessels, atria, ventricles, and left anterior descending coronary artery—may be lower with proton- versus photon-based RT. Methods and Materials: In this retrospective review, we selected 26 patients who experienced cardiac events after CRT for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer and matched them to 26 patients who did not experience cardiac events after CRT. Matching was done based on RT technique (protons vs photons), age, sex, and cardiovascular comorbidity. For each patient, the whole heart and 10 cardiovascular substructures on the RT planning computerized tomography scan were manually contoured. Dosimetric comparisons were made between those who did and did not experience cardiac events and between the proton and photon groups. Results: There was no significant difference in heart or any cardiovascular substructure dose between those patients who experienced post-treatment cardiac events and those who did not (P > .05 for all). The mean heart dose in the patients receiving proton therapy was significantly lower than the mean heart dose in the patients receiving photon therapy (P = .032). The left ventricle, right ventricle, and the left anterior descending artery also had significantly lower doses (by multiple measures) when treated with protons (P = .0004, P < .0001, and P = .0002, respectively). Conclusions: Proton therapy may have a significant effect on decreasing dose to individual cardiovascular substructures compared with photon therapy. There was no significant difference in heart dose or dose to any cardiovascular substructure between patients who did and did not experience post-treatment cardiac events. Further research should be done to assess the association between cardiovascular substructure dose and post-treatment cardiac events.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85154566353&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101235
DO - 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101235
M3 - Article
C2 - 37408679
AN - SCOPUS:85154566353
SN - 2452-1094
VL - 8
SP - 101235
JO - Advances in Radiation Oncology
JF - Advances in Radiation Oncology
IS - 5
M1 - 101235
ER -