Carcinoids: The prognostic effect of primary site histologic type variations

Lewis A. Johnson, Philip T. Lavin, Charles G. Moertel, Louis H. Weiland, Yogeshwar Y. Dayal, Wilhelm G. Doos, Stephen A. Geller, Harry S. Cooper, Serge R. Masse, Paul F. Engstrom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Carcinoids are histologically classified as insular (A), trabecular (B), glandular (C), undifferentiated (D) or mixed. These have prognostic significance, i.e. Group 1 (most favorable, A+C); 2 (favorable, A, B, A+B); 3 (relatively unfavorable, all non A+C or A+B mixed types); and 4 (unfavorable, C, D). Midgut primaries have a better prognosis than either foregut or hindgut/cloacal primaries. Carcinoids from 114 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group patients were studied to determine if primary site prognostic differences result from histologic prognostic group occurrence rate differences across primary sites. By primary site the following rates were observed: Foregut: 1 (0%), 2 (79.2%), 3 (12.5%), 4 (8.3%); midgut: 1 (26.7%), 2(58.7%), 3 (6.6%), 4 (8.0%); hindgut/cloaca: 1 (0%), 2 (42.9%), 3 (42.9%), 4 (14.2%); nongut: 1 (0%), 2 (75.0%), 3 (12.5%), 4 (12.5%), p < 0.01. The results demonstrate that primary site prognostic differences are highly dependent upon histologic prognostic group occurrence rate variations across primary sites. In addition multivariate analysis of survivorship by both histologic type (p < 0.05) and primary site (p < 0.05) demonstrated that each variable has independent prognostic significance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)81-83
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Surgical Oncology
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1986

Keywords

  • Aged
  • Carcinoid Tumor/pathology
  • Digestive System Neoplasms/pathology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prognosis
  • Statistics as Topic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Carcinoids: The prognostic effect of primary site histologic type variations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this