Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Building Cross-Institutional Collaborative Infrastructure and Processes: Early Lessons From the Chicago Cancer Health Equity Collaborative: Early lessons from the chicago cancer health equity collaborative

  • M. A. Simon
  • , M. Fitzgibbon
  • , C. Ciecierski
  • , J. M. Cooper
  • , E. Martinez
  • , L. Tom
  • , J. Kanoon
  • , J. Feinglass
  • , R. Warnecke
  • , M. Stuart
  • , M. Stern
  • , L. Filus
  • , R. A. Winn
  • Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
  • University of Illinois Cancer Center, Chicago. IL
  • Northeastern Illinois University
  • Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
  • University of Illinois at Chicago

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Addressing cancer health disparities requires a multitiered, comprehensive approach. The Chicago Cancer Health Equity Collaborative (ChicagoCHEC) was established as a tri-institutional partnership to advance cancer health equity through scientific discovery, education, and community engagement. OBJECTIVES: Large-scale partnerships rarely document the challenges encountered when establishing processes and operations in the formative years of engagement. We outline selected lessons learned from the first three years of ChicagoCHEC in hopes that future collaborations may be better poised to hit the ground running and create the needed infrastructure for a strong, effective, and sustainable partnership. LESSONS LEARNED: Unifying a diverse group of stakeholders under a shared mission is imperative. A shared governance structure, in which all individuals understand the aims of partnership and can facilitate progress, is crucial for success. Ongoing monitoring of collaborative processes should occur and attention should be given to the optimization of communications. CONCLUSIONS: Large-scale collaborative research and education projects across institutions can be challenging, particularly when establishing a working infrastructure and aligning priorities. However, the benefit of establishing key processes in the early years of the collaborative process can lead to high-quality research output, impact, and a sustainable partnership.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-13
Number of pages9
JournalProgress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action
Volume13
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Biomedical Research/*organization & administration Cancer Care Facilities/*organization & administration Capacity Building/organization & administration Chicago Community Participation Community-Institutional Relations Cooperative Behavior *Cultural Diversity Health Occupations/*education Humans *Interinstitutional Relations Minority Groups

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Building Cross-Institutional Collaborative Infrastructure and Processes: Early Lessons From the Chicago Cancer Health Equity Collaborative: Early lessons from the chicago cancer health equity collaborative'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this