TY - JOUR
T1 - Avapritinib versus regorafenib in locally advanced unresectable or metastatic GI stromal tumor
T2 - A randomized, open-label phase III study
AU - Kang, Yoon Koo
AU - George, Suzanne
AU - Jones, Robin L.
AU - Rutkowski, Piotr
AU - Shen, Lin
AU - Mir, Olivier
AU - Patel, Shreyaskumar
AU - Zhou, Yongjian
AU - von Mehren, Margaret
AU - Hohenberger, Peter
AU - Villalobos, Victor
AU - Brahmi, Mehdi
AU - Tap, William D.
AU - Trent, Jonathan
AU - Pantaleo, Maria A.
AU - Schöffski, Patrick
AU - He, Kevin
AU - Hew, Paggy
AU - Newberry, Kate
AU - Roche, Maria
AU - Heinrich, Michael C.
AU - Bauer, Sebastian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
PY - 2021/10/1
Y1 - 2021/10/1
N2 - PURPOSE: Primary or secondary mutations in
KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (
PDGFRA) underlie tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance in most GI stromal tumors (GISTs). Avapritinib selectively and potently inhibits KIT- and PDGFRA-mutant kinases. In the phase I NAVIGATOR study (NCT02508532), avapritinib showed clinical activity against PDGFRA D842V-mutant and later-line KIT-mutant GIST. VOYAGER (NCT03465722), a phase III study, evaluated efficacy and safety of avapritinib versus regorafenib as third-line or later treatment in patients with unresectable or metastatic GIST.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: VOYAGER randomly assigned patients 1:1 to avapritinib 300 mg once daily (4 weeks continuously) or regorafenib 160 mg once daily (3 weeks on and 1 week off). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by central radiology per RECIST version 1.1 modified for GIST. Secondary end points included objective response rate, overall survival, safety, disease control rate, and duration of response. Regorafenib to avapritinib crossover was permitted upon centrally confirmed disease progression.RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-six patients were randomly assigned (avapritinib, n = 240; regorafenib, n = 236). Median PFS was not statistically different between avapritinib and regorafenib (hazard ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.57; 4.2
v 5.6 months;
P = .055). Overall survival data were immature at cutoff. Objective response rates were 17.1% and 7.2%, with durations of responses of 7.6 and 9.4 months for avapritinib and regorafenib; disease control rates were 41.7% (95% CI, 35.4 to 48.2) and 46.2% (95% CI, 39.7 to 52.8). Treatment-related adverse events (any grade, grade ≥ 3) were similar for avapritinib (92.5% and 55.2%) and regorafenib (96.2% and 57.7%).
CONCLUSION: Primary end point was not met. There was no significant difference in median PFS between avapritinib and regorafenib in patients with molecularly unselected, late-line GIST.
AB - PURPOSE: Primary or secondary mutations in
KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (
PDGFRA) underlie tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance in most GI stromal tumors (GISTs). Avapritinib selectively and potently inhibits KIT- and PDGFRA-mutant kinases. In the phase I NAVIGATOR study (NCT02508532), avapritinib showed clinical activity against PDGFRA D842V-mutant and later-line KIT-mutant GIST. VOYAGER (NCT03465722), a phase III study, evaluated efficacy and safety of avapritinib versus regorafenib as third-line or later treatment in patients with unresectable or metastatic GIST.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: VOYAGER randomly assigned patients 1:1 to avapritinib 300 mg once daily (4 weeks continuously) or regorafenib 160 mg once daily (3 weeks on and 1 week off). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by central radiology per RECIST version 1.1 modified for GIST. Secondary end points included objective response rate, overall survival, safety, disease control rate, and duration of response. Regorafenib to avapritinib crossover was permitted upon centrally confirmed disease progression.RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-six patients were randomly assigned (avapritinib, n = 240; regorafenib, n = 236). Median PFS was not statistically different between avapritinib and regorafenib (hazard ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.57; 4.2
v 5.6 months;
P = .055). Overall survival data were immature at cutoff. Objective response rates were 17.1% and 7.2%, with durations of responses of 7.6 and 9.4 months for avapritinib and regorafenib; disease control rates were 41.7% (95% CI, 35.4 to 48.2) and 46.2% (95% CI, 39.7 to 52.8). Treatment-related adverse events (any grade, grade ≥ 3) were similar for avapritinib (92.5% and 55.2%) and regorafenib (96.2% and 57.7%).
CONCLUSION: Primary end point was not met. There was no significant difference in median PFS between avapritinib and regorafenib in patients with molecularly unselected, late-line GIST.
KW - Adult
KW - Aged
KW - Aged, 80 and over
KW - Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage
KW - Asia
KW - Australia
KW - Disease Progression
KW - Drug Administration Schedule
KW - Europe
KW - Female
KW - Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/drug therapy
KW - Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/drug therapy
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Mutation
KW - North America
KW - Phenylurea Compounds/administration & dosage
KW - Progression-Free Survival
KW - Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage
KW - Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit/antagonists & inhibitors
KW - Pyrazoles/administration & dosage
KW - Pyridines/administration & dosage
KW - Pyrroles/administration & dosage
KW - Receptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor alpha/antagonists & inhibitors
KW - Time Factors
KW - Triazines/administration & dosage
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117739966&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=purepublist2023&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000708641200006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.21.00217
DO - 10.1200/JCO.21.00217
M3 - Article
C2 - 34343033
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 39
SP - 3128
EP - 3139
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 28
ER -