TY - JOUR
T1 - Analysis of the 2024 Breast Surgical Oncology Fellowship Match
T2 - Survey of Applicants’ and Program Directors’ Preferences Regarding In-Person Versus Virtual Interviews
AU - The Society of Surgical Oncology/American Society of Breast Surgeons Breast Surgical Oncology Fellowship Program Directors Committee
AU - Plichta, Jennifer K.
AU - Bleicher, Richard J.
AU - Boughey, Judy
AU - Margenthaler, Julie A.
AU - Mason, Holly
AU - Pesce, Catherine
AU - Schulz-Costello, Katharine
AU - Sharma, Ranjna
AU - Sweeting, Raeshell
AU - Teshome, Mediget
AU - Leong, Wey
AU - Carter, W. Brad
AU - Jones, Veronica
AU - Staradub, Valerie
AU - Klimberg, V. Suzanne
AU - Hoover, Susan
AU - Boolbol, Susan
AU - Valente, Stephanie
AU - Downs-Canner, Stephanie
AU - Bernik, Stephanie
AU - Kumar, Shicha
AU - Willey, Shawna
AU - Fine, Richard
AU - Leong, Rachelle
AU - Wooldridge, Rachel
AU - Greenup, Rachel
AU - Singh, Puneet
AU - Borgen, Patrick
AU - Hansen, Nora M.
AU - Dekhne, Nayana
AU - Specht, Michelle
AU - Cowher, Michael
AU - Alvarado, Michael
AU - Milburn, Meghan
AU - McEvoy, Maureen
AU - Cripe, Mark
AU - Boisvert, Marc
AU - Wallace, Lucy
AU - Wiechmann, Lisa
AU - Jacobs, Lisa
AU - Hadzikadic-Gusic, Lejla
AU - Skinner, Kristin A.
AU - Larson, Kelsey
AU - Tchou, Julia
AU - Albright, Joslyn
AU - Young, Jessica
AU - Bensenhaver, Jessica
AU - Baker, Jennifer
AU - Grumley, Janie
AU - Jeruss, Jacqueline
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Society of Surgical Oncology 2025.
PY - 2025/10
Y1 - 2025/10
N2 - Background: In 2020, in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, Breast Surgical Oncology (BSO) fellowship programs transitioned to virtual interviews; however, for the 2024 cycle, programs selected either virtual or in-person interviews with applicants participating in potentially both formats. Following the match, a survey was performed to evaluate experiences among applicants and program directors (PDs). Methods: Surveys were developed within the BSO Fellowship Program Directors Committee and distributed via email to matched applicants and PDs from 18 July 2024 to 9 August 2024. Descriptive statistics were conducted. Results: Of the 89 matched applicants, 60 completed the survey (response rate 67.4%). Most applicants (76.7%, n = 46) preferred in-person over virtual interviews. The top reason for preferring in-person was ‘to see the program in person’ (56.7%, n = 34). Nearly half of applicants (48.3%, n = 29) estimated spending ≥$5000 on interviews, and 78.3% (n = 47) indicated the cost was ‘worth it’. Over half of applicants (51.7%, n = 31) reported interview style had an impact on their match. Of the 64 PDs, 38 completed the survey (response rate 59.4%). Virtual interviews were the most common format (65.8%, n = 25). The most important factor reported by most programs regarding the interview approach was cost to applicants (42.1%, n = 16). Over half of PDs (52.6%, n = 20) felt the interview approach influenced the match. Conclusions: The majority of 2024 BSO fellowship matched applicants preferred in-person interviews, noting the importance of location, faculty, and culture to their decision making. This data may assist PDs in choosing the interview approach best suited for their programs and guide training programs more broadly.
AB - Background: In 2020, in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, Breast Surgical Oncology (BSO) fellowship programs transitioned to virtual interviews; however, for the 2024 cycle, programs selected either virtual or in-person interviews with applicants participating in potentially both formats. Following the match, a survey was performed to evaluate experiences among applicants and program directors (PDs). Methods: Surveys were developed within the BSO Fellowship Program Directors Committee and distributed via email to matched applicants and PDs from 18 July 2024 to 9 August 2024. Descriptive statistics were conducted. Results: Of the 89 matched applicants, 60 completed the survey (response rate 67.4%). Most applicants (76.7%, n = 46) preferred in-person over virtual interviews. The top reason for preferring in-person was ‘to see the program in person’ (56.7%, n = 34). Nearly half of applicants (48.3%, n = 29) estimated spending ≥$5000 on interviews, and 78.3% (n = 47) indicated the cost was ‘worth it’. Over half of applicants (51.7%, n = 31) reported interview style had an impact on their match. Of the 64 PDs, 38 completed the survey (response rate 59.4%). Virtual interviews were the most common format (65.8%, n = 25). The most important factor reported by most programs regarding the interview approach was cost to applicants (42.1%, n = 16). Over half of PDs (52.6%, n = 20) felt the interview approach influenced the match. Conclusions: The majority of 2024 BSO fellowship matched applicants preferred in-person interviews, noting the importance of location, faculty, and culture to their decision making. This data may assist PDs in choosing the interview approach best suited for their programs and guide training programs more broadly.
KW - Breast fellowship
KW - Fellowship interviews
KW - Match
KW - Program directors
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105016791699
U2 - 10.1245/s10434-025-18043-9
DO - 10.1245/s10434-025-18043-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 40849385
SN - 1068-9265
VL - 32
SP - 8514
EP - 8522
JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology
JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology
IS - 11
ER -