TY - JOUR
T1 - An integrative approach to inform optimal administration of OX40 agonist antibodies in patients with advanced solid tumors
AU - Wang, Rui
AU - Gao, Chan
AU - Raymond, Megan
AU - Dito, Gennaro
AU - Kabbabe, Dominic
AU - Shao, Xiao
AU - Hilt, Ed
AU - Sun, Yongliang
AU - Pak, Irene
AU - Gutierrez, Martin
AU - Melero, Ignacio
AU - Spreafico, Anna
AU - Carvajal, Richard D.
AU - Ong, Michael
AU - Olszanski, Anthony J.
AU - Milburn, Christina
AU - Thudium, Kent
AU - Yang, Zheng
AU - Feng, Yan
AU - Fracasso, Paula M.
AU - Korman, Alan J.
AU - Aanur, Praveen
AU - Huang, Shih Min A.
AU - Quigley, Michael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Association for Cancer Research.
PY - 2019/11/15
Y1 - 2019/11/15
N2 - Purpose: The success of checkpoint blockade has led to a significant increase in the development of a broad range of immunomodulatory molecules for the treatment of cancer, including agonists against T-cell costimulatory receptors, such as OX40. Unlike checkpoint blockade, where complete and sustained receptor saturation may be required for maximal activity, the optimal dosing regimen and receptor occupancy for agonist agents is less well understood and requires further study. Experimental Design: We integrated both preclinical and clinical biomarker data sets centered on dose, exposure, receptor occupancy, receptor engagement, and downstream pharmacodynamic changes to model the optimal dose and schedule for the OX40 agonist antibody BMS-986178 alone and in combination with checkpoint blockade. Results: Administration of the ligand-blocking anti-mouse surrogate antibody OX40.23 or BMS-986178 as monotherapy or in combination with checkpoint blockade led to increased peripheral CD4þ and CD8þ T-cell activation in tumor-bearing mice and patients with solid tumors, respectively. OX40 receptor occupancy between 20% and 50% both in vitro and in vivo was associated with maximal enhancement of T-cell effector function by anti-OX40 treatment, whereas a receptor occupancy > 40% led to a profound loss in OX40 receptor expression, with clear implications for availability for repeat dosing. Conclusions: Our results highlight the value of an integrated translational approach applied during early clinical development to aggregate preclinical and clinical data in an effort to define the optimal dose and schedule for T-cell agonists in the clinic.
AB - Purpose: The success of checkpoint blockade has led to a significant increase in the development of a broad range of immunomodulatory molecules for the treatment of cancer, including agonists against T-cell costimulatory receptors, such as OX40. Unlike checkpoint blockade, where complete and sustained receptor saturation may be required for maximal activity, the optimal dosing regimen and receptor occupancy for agonist agents is less well understood and requires further study. Experimental Design: We integrated both preclinical and clinical biomarker data sets centered on dose, exposure, receptor occupancy, receptor engagement, and downstream pharmacodynamic changes to model the optimal dose and schedule for the OX40 agonist antibody BMS-986178 alone and in combination with checkpoint blockade. Results: Administration of the ligand-blocking anti-mouse surrogate antibody OX40.23 or BMS-986178 as monotherapy or in combination with checkpoint blockade led to increased peripheral CD4þ and CD8þ T-cell activation in tumor-bearing mice and patients with solid tumors, respectively. OX40 receptor occupancy between 20% and 50% both in vitro and in vivo was associated with maximal enhancement of T-cell effector function by anti-OX40 treatment, whereas a receptor occupancy > 40% led to a profound loss in OX40 receptor expression, with clear implications for availability for repeat dosing. Conclusions: Our results highlight the value of an integrated translational approach applied during early clinical development to aggregate preclinical and clinical data in an effort to define the optimal dose and schedule for T-cell agonists in the clinic.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075090015&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=purepublist2023&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000497334300019&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS
U2 - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0526
DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0526
M3 - Article
C2 - 31573956
SN - 1078-0432
VL - 25
SP - 6709
EP - 6720
JO - Clinical Cancer Research
JF - Clinical Cancer Research
IS - 22
ER -