Adjuvant Pembrolizumab versus Observation in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma

Andrea B Apolo, Karla V Ballman, Guru Sonpavde, Stephanie Berg, William Y Kim, Rahul Parikh, Min Yuen Teo, Randy F Sweis, Daniel M Geynisman, Petros Grivas, Gurkamal Chatta, Zachery Roger Reichert, Joseph W Kim, Mehmet Asim Bilen, Bradley McGregor, Parminder Singh, Abhishek Tripathi, Suzanne Cole, Nicholas Simon, Scot NiglioLisa Ley, Lisa Cordes, Sandy Srinivas, Jiaoti Huang, Meagan Odegaard, Colleen Watt, Daniel Petrylak, Jeannie Hoffman-Censits, Yujia Wen, Olwen Hahn, Cecilia Mitchell, Alan Tan, Howard Streicher, Elad Sharon, Helen Moon, Michael Woods, Susan Halabi, Gabriela Perez Burbano, Michael J Morris, Jonathan E Rosenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma is an aggressive disease with high rates of relapse. Whether pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy would be effective in patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma after radical surgery is unknown.

METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive pembrolizumab at a dose of 200 mg every 3 weeks for 1 year or to undergo observation. Randomization was stratified according to pathological stage, centrally tested programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status, and previous neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The coprimary end points were disease-free survival and overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. We considered the trial to be successful if either disease-free survival or overall survival was significantly longer with pembrolizumab than with observation.

RESULTS: A total of 702 patients underwent randomization; 354 were assigned to receive pembrolizumab, and 348 were assigned to observation. As of July 5, 2024, the median duration of follow-up for disease-free survival was 44.8 months. The median disease-free survival was 29.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.0 to 40.7) with pembrolizumab and 14.2 months (95% CI, 11.0 to 20.2) with observation (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.90; two-sided P = 0.003). Grade 3 or higher adverse events (regardless of attribution) occurred in 50.6% of the patients in the pembrolizumab group and in 31.6% of the patients in the observation group.

CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma after radical surgery, disease-free survival was significantly longer with adjuvant pembrolizumab than with observation. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health and others; Alliance A031501 AMBASSADOR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03244384.).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-55
Number of pages11
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume392
Early online dateSep 15 2024
DOIs
StateE-pub ahead of print - Sep 15 2024

Keywords

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use
  • Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use
  • Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy
  • Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intention to Treat Analysis
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Invasiveness
  • Survival Analysis
  • Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy
  • Urologic Neoplasms/drug therapy
  • Watchful Waiting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Adjuvant Pembrolizumab versus Observation in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this