Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Achieving Adherence With NCCN Guidelines for Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Regarding Peripheral and Deep En Face Margin Assessment (PDEMA)

  • Yaohui G. Xu
  • , Young Lim
  • , Jeremy S. Bordeaux
  • , Sumaira Z. Aasi
  • , Murad Alam
  • , Pei Ling Chen
  • , Carlo M. Contreras
  • , Dominick DiMaio
  • , Jessica M. Donigan
  • , Jeffrey M. Farma
  • , Roy C. Grekin
  • , Lawrence Mark
  • , Kishwer S. Nehal
  • , Paul Nghiem
  • , Kelly Olino
  • , Tejesh Patel
  • , Jeffrey Scott
  • , Ashok R. Shaha
  • , Divya Srivastava
  • , Chrysalyne D. Schmults
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • Stanford University
  • Northwestern University
  • Moffitt Cancer Center
  • Ohio State University
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center
  • University of Utah
  • University of California at San Francisco
  • Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • Department of Dermatology
  • Yale University
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center
  • Clinical Skin Center of Northern Virginia
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Peripheral and deep en face margin assessment (PDEMA), formerly termed by NCCN as complete circumferential peripheral and deep margin assessment (CCPDMA), has the advantages of histologic visualization of the entire marginal surface, highly accurate resection of involved tissue, and sparing of uninvolved tissue. Owing to its highest reported cure rates, PDEMA is the NCCN-preferred treatment for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, high-risk basal cell carcinoma, and very-high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. In the United States, Mohs micrographic surgery (Mohs) is the most common method of PDEMA. In Germany and some other countries, non-Mohs methods of PDEMA referred to as the Tubingen torte and muffin techniques are more widely used. The Tubingen methods of PDEMA require close communication between surgeon and pathologist. This article describes the background of both Mohs and Tubingen PDEMA, reviews what constitutes PDEMA, and provides a protocol for Tubingen PDEMA detailing critical components in a stepwise fashion using illustrative photos and diagrams. We hope to broaden understanding of the NCCN Guidelines and their rationale, align practice, and optimize patient outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere247037
JournalJNCCN Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Volume22
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology
  • Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Margins of Excision
  • Mohs Surgery/methods
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Skin Neoplasms/pathology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Achieving Adherence With NCCN Guidelines for Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Regarding Peripheral and Deep En Face Margin Assessment (PDEMA)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this