TY - JOUR
T1 - Achieving Adherence With NCCN Guidelines for Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Regarding Peripheral and Deep En Face Margin Assessment (PDEMA)
AU - Xu, Yaohui G.
AU - Lim, Young
AU - Bordeaux, Jeremy S.
AU - Aasi, Sumaira Z.
AU - Alam, Murad
AU - Chen, Pei Ling
AU - Contreras, Carlo M.
AU - DiMaio, Dominick
AU - Donigan, Jessica M.
AU - Farma, Jeffrey M.
AU - Grekin, Roy C.
AU - Mark, Lawrence
AU - Nehal, Kishwer S.
AU - Nghiem, Paul
AU - Olino, Kelly
AU - Patel, Tejesh
AU - Scott, Jeffrey
AU - Shaha, Ashok R.
AU - Srivastava, Divya
AU - Schmults, Chrysalyne D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Harborside Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/11
Y1 - 2024/11
N2 - Peripheral and deep en face margin assessment (PDEMA), formerly termed by NCCN as complete circumferential peripheral and deep margin assessment (CCPDMA), has the advantages of histologic visualization of the entire marginal surface, highly accurate resection of involved tissue, and sparing of uninvolved tissue. Owing to its highest reported cure rates, PDEMA is the NCCN-preferred treatment for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, high-risk basal cell carcinoma, and very-high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. In the United States, Mohs micrographic surgery (Mohs) is the most common method of PDEMA. In Germany and some other countries, non-Mohs methods of PDEMA referred to as the Tubingen torte and muffin techniques are more widely used. The Tubingen methods of PDEMA require close communication between surgeon and pathologist. This article describes the background of both Mohs and Tubingen PDEMA, reviews what constitutes PDEMA, and provides a protocol for Tubingen PDEMA detailing critical components in a stepwise fashion using illustrative photos and diagrams. We hope to broaden understanding of the NCCN Guidelines and their rationale, align practice, and optimize patient outcomes.
AB - Peripheral and deep en face margin assessment (PDEMA), formerly termed by NCCN as complete circumferential peripheral and deep margin assessment (CCPDMA), has the advantages of histologic visualization of the entire marginal surface, highly accurate resection of involved tissue, and sparing of uninvolved tissue. Owing to its highest reported cure rates, PDEMA is the NCCN-preferred treatment for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, high-risk basal cell carcinoma, and very-high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. In the United States, Mohs micrographic surgery (Mohs) is the most common method of PDEMA. In Germany and some other countries, non-Mohs methods of PDEMA referred to as the Tubingen torte and muffin techniques are more widely used. The Tubingen methods of PDEMA require close communication between surgeon and pathologist. This article describes the background of both Mohs and Tubingen PDEMA, reviews what constitutes PDEMA, and provides a protocol for Tubingen PDEMA detailing critical components in a stepwise fashion using illustrative photos and diagrams. We hope to broaden understanding of the NCCN Guidelines and their rationale, align practice, and optimize patient outcomes.
KW - Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology
KW - Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data
KW - Humans
KW - Margins of Excision
KW - Mohs Surgery/methods
KW - Practice Guidelines as Topic
KW - Skin Neoplasms/pathology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85209360521&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.6004/jnccn.2024.7037
DO - 10.6004/jnccn.2024.7037
M3 - Article
C2 - 39536442
AN - SCOPUS:85209360521
SN - 1540-1405
VL - 22
JO - Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN
JF - Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN
IS - 9
M1 - e247037
ER -