TY - JOUR
T1 - A qualitative analysis of couples' communication regarding colorectal cancer screening using the Interdependence Model
AU - Manne, Sharon
AU - Etz, Rebecca S.
AU - Hudson, Shawna V.
AU - Medina-Forrester, Amanda
AU - Boscarino, Joseph A.
AU - Bowen, Deborah J.
AU - Weinberg, David S.
PY - 2012/4
Y1 - 2012/4
N2 - Objective: Colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) uptake in the US remains low. The purpose of this study was to use qualitative methods to characterize partner support and influence regarding CRCS decisions among couples who were both either adherent or non-adherent with CRCS. Methods: Eighteen couples were interviewed regarding their discussions about CRCS and support and influence strategies used. Analyses were guided by the Interdependence Model. Results: Direct and indirect partner effects were found. Direct partner effects were evidenced when the impact of one spouse on the CRCS decision of the other was clearly defined and intended. Three direct partner effect themes were leadership, persuasion, and partnership. Indirect partner effects were evidenced by one spouse considering the information, experience, or actions of the other in ways that informed CRCS decision-making, even if that influence was not intentional or specifically directed at CRCS. Three indirect partner effect themes were companionship, support, and peer socialization. Conclusion: Spouse influence plays a role in CRCS decisions. Individuals view CRCS as being important to the health and quality of their relationship. Practice implications: With this increased understanding of the interpersonal context of CRCS, it may be possible to include close others in interventions to improve CRCS.
AB - Objective: Colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) uptake in the US remains low. The purpose of this study was to use qualitative methods to characterize partner support and influence regarding CRCS decisions among couples who were both either adherent or non-adherent with CRCS. Methods: Eighteen couples were interviewed regarding their discussions about CRCS and support and influence strategies used. Analyses were guided by the Interdependence Model. Results: Direct and indirect partner effects were found. Direct partner effects were evidenced when the impact of one spouse on the CRCS decision of the other was clearly defined and intended. Three direct partner effect themes were leadership, persuasion, and partnership. Indirect partner effects were evidenced by one spouse considering the information, experience, or actions of the other in ways that informed CRCS decision-making, even if that influence was not intentional or specifically directed at CRCS. Three indirect partner effect themes were companionship, support, and peer socialization. Conclusion: Spouse influence plays a role in CRCS decisions. Individuals view CRCS as being important to the health and quality of their relationship. Practice implications: With this increased understanding of the interpersonal context of CRCS, it may be possible to include close others in interventions to improve CRCS.
KW - Colorectal cancer screening
KW - Couples
KW - Interdependence Model
KW - Intimate relationships
KW - Qualitative research
KW - Support and influence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859162361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=purepublist2023&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000303182000004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS
U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.012
DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 21835574
SN - 0738-3991
VL - 87
SP - 18
EP - 22
JO - Patient Education and Counseling
JF - Patient Education and Counseling
IS - 1
ER -
