A Pooled Toxicity Analysis of Moderately Hypofractionated Proton Beam Therapy and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Early-Stage Prostate Cancer Patients

Neha Vapiwala, J. Karen Wong, Elizabeth Handorf, Jonathan Paly, Amardeep Grewal, Rahul Tendulkar, Devon Godfrey, David Carpenter, Nancy P. Mendenhall, Randal H. Henderson, Bradley J. Stish, Carlos Vargas, Joseph K. Salama, Brian J. Davis, Eric M. Horwitz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Data comparing moderately hypofractionated intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and proton beam therapy (PBT) are lacking. We aim to compare late toxicity profiles of patients with early-stage prostate cancer treated with moderately hypofractionated PBT and IMRT. Methods and Materials: This multi-institutional analysis included patients with low- or intermediate-risk biopsy-proven prostate adenocarcinoma from 7 tertiary referral centers treated from 1998 to 2018. All patients were treated with moderately hypofractionated radiation, defined as 250 to 300 cGy per daily fraction given for 4 to 6 weeks, and stratified by use of IMRT or PBT. Primary outcomes were late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. Adjusted toxicity rates were calculated using inverse probability of treatment weighting, accounting for race, National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk group, age, pretreatment International Prostate Symptom Score (GU only), and anticoagulant use (GI only). Results: A total of 1850 patients were included: 1282 IMRT (median follow-up 80.0 months) and 568 PBT (median follow-up 43.9 months). Overall toxicity rates were low, with the majority of patients experiencing no late GU (56.6%, n = 1048) or late GI (74.4%, n = 1377) toxicity. No difference was seen in the rates of late toxicity between the groups, with late grade 3+ GU toxicity of 2.0% versus 3.9% (odds ratio [OR] 0.47; 95% confidence interval 0.17-1.28) and late grade 2+ GI toxicity of 14.6% versus 4.7% (OR 2.69; confidence interval 0.80-9.05) for the PBT and IMRT cohorts, respectively. On multivariable analysis, no factors were significantly predictive of GU toxicity, and only anticoagulant use was significantly predictive of GI toxicity (OR 1.90; P =.008). Conclusions: In this large, multi-institutional analysis of 1850 patients with early-stage prostate cancer, treatment with moderately hypofractionated IMRT and PBT resulted in low rates of toxicity. No difference was seen in late GI and GU toxicity between the modalities during long-term follow-up. Both treatments are safe and well tolerated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1082-1089
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume110
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 15 2021

Keywords

  • Aged
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Organs at Risk/radiation effects
  • Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology
  • Proton Therapy/adverse effects
  • Radiation Dose Hypofractionation
  • Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/adverse effects
  • Rectum/radiation effects
  • Risk Factors

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Pooled Toxicity Analysis of Moderately Hypofractionated Proton Beam Therapy and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Early-Stage Prostate Cancer Patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this