Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A multi-institutional critical assessment of dorsal onlay urethroplasty for post-radiation urethral stenosis

  • Connor G. Policastro
  • , Jay Simhan
  • , Francisco E. Martins
  • , Nicolaas Lumen
  • , Krishnan Venkatesan
  • , Javier C. Angulo
  • , Shubham Gupta
  • , Paul Rusilko
  • , Erick Alejandro Ramírez Pérez
  • , Kirk Redger
  • , Brian J. Flynn
  • , Michael Hughes
  • , Stephen Blakely
  • , Dmitriy Nikolavsky
  • SUNY Upstate Medical University
  • University of Lisbon
  • Ghent University
  • Georgetown University
  • Washington Hospital Center
  • Universidad Europea
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Hospital Angeles Mocel
  • University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To critically evaluate a multi-institutional patient cohort undergoing Dorsal-Onlay Buccal Mucosal Graft Urethroplasty (D-BMGU) for recurrent post-radiation posterior urethral stenosis. Methods: Retrospective multi-institutional review of patients with posterior urethral stenosis from 10 institutions between 2010–2019 was performed. Patients with at least 1-year follow-up were assessed. Patient demographics, stenosis characteristics, peri-operative outcomes, and post-operative clinical and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed. The primary outcomes were stenosis recurrence and de-novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Secondary outcomes were changes in voiding, sexual function, and patient-reported satisfaction. Results: Seventy-nine men with post-radiation urethral stenosis treated with D-BMGU met inclusion criteria. Median age and stenosis length were 72 years, (IQR 66–75), and 3.0 cm (IQR 2.5–4 cm), respectively. Radiation modalities included: 36 (45.6%) external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), 13 (16.5%) brachytherapy (BT), 10 (12.7%) combination EBRT/BT, and 20 (25.3%) EBRT/radical prostatectomy. At a median follow-up of 21 months (IQR 13–40), 14 patients (17.7%) had stenosis recurrence. Among 37 preoperatively-continent patients, 3 men (8.1%) developed de-novo SUI following dorsal onlay urethroplasty. Of 29 patients with preoperative SUI all but one remained incontinent post-operatively (96.6%). Following repair, patients experienced significant improvement in PVR (92.5 to 26 cc, p = 0.001) and Uroflow (4.6 to 15.9 cc/s, p = 0.001), and high overall satisfaction, with 91.9% reporting a GRA of + 2 or better). Conclusion: Dorsal onlay buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty is a safe and feasible technique in patients with post-radiation posterior urethral stenosis. This non-transecting approach may confer low rates of de-novo SUI. Further research is needed to compare this technique with excisional urethroplasty.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2669-2675
Number of pages7
JournalWorld Journal of Urology
Volume39
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2021

Keywords

  • Aged
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mouth Mucosa/transplantation
  • Radiation Injuries/surgery
  • Recurrence
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Urethra/surgery
  • Urethral Stricture/etiology
  • Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male/methods

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A multi-institutional critical assessment of dorsal onlay urethroplasty for post-radiation urethral stenosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this