TY - JOUR
T1 - A Comprehensive Review of School-Based Body Mass Index Screening Programs and Their Implications for School Health
T2 - Do the Controversies Accurately Reflect the Research?
AU - Ruggieri, Dominique G.
AU - Bass, Sarah B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, American School Health Association.
PY - 2015/1/1
Y1 - 2015/1/1
N2 - Whereas legislation for body mass index (BMI) surveillance and screening programs has passed in 25 states, the programs are often subject to ethical debates about confidentiality and privacy, school-to-parent communication, and safety and self-esteem issues for students. Despite this debate, no comprehensive analysis has been completed that compares and contrasts how these issues differentially affect schools, parents, and students. METHODS: A keyword search from electronic databases a review of state legislation related to BMI surveillance screening was used to identify relevant literature data focused on surveillance screening policies, BMI report cards, parental perceptions of BMI screenings their child's weight status. RESULTS: This article addresses the gap of previous literature by outlining the ethical considerations and implications that BMI screening programs and report cards have for schools, parents, and students, and links these with outcome studies to address whether these controversies are supported by research. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the controversies surrounding these programs, this review shows that they can be valuable for all parties and demonstrates BMI screening programs to be vital to the development of robust school-based obesity prevention programs and promotion of healthy lifestyles in schools.
AB - Whereas legislation for body mass index (BMI) surveillance and screening programs has passed in 25 states, the programs are often subject to ethical debates about confidentiality and privacy, school-to-parent communication, and safety and self-esteem issues for students. Despite this debate, no comprehensive analysis has been completed that compares and contrasts how these issues differentially affect schools, parents, and students. METHODS: A keyword search from electronic databases a review of state legislation related to BMI surveillance screening was used to identify relevant literature data focused on surveillance screening policies, BMI report cards, parental perceptions of BMI screenings their child's weight status. RESULTS: This article addresses the gap of previous literature by outlining the ethical considerations and implications that BMI screening programs and report cards have for schools, parents, and students, and links these with outcome studies to address whether these controversies are supported by research. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the controversies surrounding these programs, this review shows that they can be valuable for all parties and demonstrates BMI screening programs to be vital to the development of robust school-based obesity prevention programs and promotion of healthy lifestyles in schools.
KW - Adolescent
KW - Body Mass Index
KW - Child
KW - Confidentiality
KW - Health Promotion/methods
KW - Humans
KW - Mass Screening/methods
KW - Obesity/prevention & control
KW - Parents/psychology
KW - Research
KW - School Health Services/organization & administration
KW - Schools
KW - State Government
KW - United States
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84913617741&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=purepublist2023&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000345761200008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS
U2 - 10.1111/josh.12222
DO - 10.1111/josh.12222
M3 - Article
C2 - 25440454
SN - 0022-4391
VL - 85
SP - 61
EP - 72
JO - Journal of School Health
JF - Journal of School Health
IS - 1
ER -