TY - JOUR
T1 - A Comparison of Request Process and Outcomes in Donation After Cardiac Death and Donation After Brain Death
T2 - Results From a National Study
AU - Siminoff, L. A.
AU - Alolod, G. P.
AU - Wilson-Genderson, M.
AU - Yuen, E. Y.N.
AU - Traino, H. M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons
PY - 2017/5
Y1 - 2017/5
N2 - Available literature points to healthcare providers’ discomfort with donation after cardiac death (DCD) and their perception of public reluctance toward the procedure. Using a national sample, we report on the communication content of actual DCD and donation after brain death (DBD) approaches by organ procurement organization (OPO) requesters and compare family decision makers’ (FDMs’) experiences of both modalities. We recruited 1601 FDMs using a validated protocol; 347 (21.7%) were of potential DCD donors. Semistructured telephone interviews yielded FDMs’ sociodemographic data, donation attitudes, assessment of approach, final outcomes, and substantiating reasons. Initial analysis consisted of bivariate analyses. Multilevel mixture models compared groups representing authorization outcome and DCD/DBD status. No significant differences in family authorization were found between DCD and DBD cases. Statistically significant associations were found between sociodemographic characteristics and authorization, with white FDMs more likely to authorize DCD or DBD than black FDMs. FDMs of both modalities had similar evaluations of requester skills, topics discussed, satisfaction, and refusal reasons. The findings suggest that the DCD/DBD distinction may not be notable to families. We recommend the use of similar approach strategies and communication skills and the development of education campaigns about the public's acceptance of DCD.
AB - Available literature points to healthcare providers’ discomfort with donation after cardiac death (DCD) and their perception of public reluctance toward the procedure. Using a national sample, we report on the communication content of actual DCD and donation after brain death (DBD) approaches by organ procurement organization (OPO) requesters and compare family decision makers’ (FDMs’) experiences of both modalities. We recruited 1601 FDMs using a validated protocol; 347 (21.7%) were of potential DCD donors. Semistructured telephone interviews yielded FDMs’ sociodemographic data, donation attitudes, assessment of approach, final outcomes, and substantiating reasons. Initial analysis consisted of bivariate analyses. Multilevel mixture models compared groups representing authorization outcome and DCD/DBD status. No significant differences in family authorization were found between DCD and DBD cases. Statistically significant associations were found between sociodemographic characteristics and authorization, with white FDMs more likely to authorize DCD or DBD than black FDMs. FDMs of both modalities had similar evaluations of requester skills, topics discussed, satisfaction, and refusal reasons. The findings suggest that the DCD/DBD distinction may not be notable to families. We recommend the use of similar approach strategies and communication skills and the development of education campaigns about the public's acceptance of DCD.
KW - donors and donation: deceased
KW - donors and donation: donation after circulatory death (DCD)
KW - education
KW - ethics and public policy
KW - health services and outcomes research
KW - organ procurement
KW - organ procurement and allocation
KW - organ procurement organization
KW - physician education
KW - social sciences
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006065094&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ajt.14084
DO - 10.1111/ajt.14084
M3 - Article
C2 - 27753206
AN - SCOPUS:85006065094
SN - 1600-6135
VL - 17
SP - 1278
EP - 1285
JO - American Journal of Transplantation
JF - American Journal of Transplantation
IS - 5
ER -